Women's Empowerment
Olivia Masi
V. Salvestrini with M. Ronchi.
We study the effect of gender composition within teams in the judiciary.
Team’s gender composition matters for decision-making: all-women teams are more likely to convict, while all-men’s teams are to make decisions.
Team’s gender composition matters for decision-quality: mixed gender panels are more likely to make good decisions compared to same-gender panels, with the effect driven by all-men teams performing poorly.
Results are not driven by specific types of crimes or by other dimensions of diversity correlated with gender.
Gender composition matters only in complex decision-making, suggesting that gender-based disparities emerge primarily when cases necessitate deeper analysis and nuanced consideration.